Recent comments (Page 1 of 15)

A recent list of comments posted on the site.

	SKYDOG1 • 4 weeks ago • Imperial Cutter I always engineer the lot esp. the power reactor and shield jenny.

	SKYDOG1 • 4 weeks ago • Imperial Cutter Need to save a few creds and get promoted up with the Imps first ;o)

	SKYDOG1 • 1 month ago • Type 10 Defender I bought one today at Strzelecki Gateway LP 7-226 ... Power and Dist were still 6E. Flogged it back as it's pretty useless with less than 8's and lost 11 million on the sale. Grrrrr!

	Roguey • 2 months ago • Ship build section back not sure what you mean.

	Liyanin • 2 months ago • Ship build section back I will never have those links.

	scottearle • 2 months ago • Xeno Scanner That just means nobody sells it within 50ly

	surferx • 3 months ago • X4 (Home) Rogey, will you evaluate the game again after the Split Vendetta is released with the 3.0 update? I think the game has come a long way to address some of your dislikes. It will get more missions, and ships and sectors -hoping you will add these to your database. JW because it's been kind of quiet here lately.

	bladesteel2000 • 3 months ago • Asp Explorer Working on now FSD booster

	CMD_DesertNinja • 3 months ago • Ship build section back When are you going to have xbox and ps4 links?

	Castor • 3 months ago • Split Elephant There are only a couple of reasons you would want a TL ship, so this is the worst of them. You need storage space, not redundant guns. As bad as it is, even the Yaki have a better TL.

	Castor • 3 months ago • Terran Katana While it's not the best M6, it's certainly not the worst, contrary to opinion below. - Price: low; this ship is one of the more affordable you can have, and that doesn't necessarily mean lower-quality building. - Hull strength: low; there's a reason it's lower, and it's not just because of its price. - Shield strength: high; it sports the second-highest shield rating of all M6s. Bad pilots stress that too much and end up eating into the hull. That's on you, not the ship. Pitting it against M7+ is cocky at best - same applies to all M6 units. - Speed: average; it does the job. - Turn rate: average; it does the job. - Cargo space: average/below average. You mount fewer M/AMLs, but there's no good reason to have them on moving turrets, anyway. Keep them on the cockpit. Now on top of that, it also happens to have a few more armament placements than most other M6 units. Again, it's not the best in that regard either, but it doesn't qualify as one of the worst - even if it does have limited choice when it comes to weapons. Yes, you could very well grab yourself a Springblossom, the Terran M6 counterpart (frankly, using anything but the Hyperion Vanguard is a sin), and while Springblossom has two more weapon placements, it also has innately weaker weapon variants. The prototype M/AML and EMPC are both weaker than the revised ones used on most Terran ships. They're less specialised compared to commonwealth weapons, and they're better at all-rounder jobs. So, no, if you're after the armoured transport, the Springblossom is what you're after. Again, though - Hyperion Vanguard excels in almost every respect, so get that instead of either of these. It's also not the worst-looking ship of its type, that much is true. Looks better than the flying sex toys that the Argon deploy everywhere.

	Castor • 3 months ago • Terran Kyoto Xenon I would like to have a word.

« Previous | Pages 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Next »