Recent comments (Page 2 of 15)

A recent list of comments posted on the site.

SKYDOG1 avatar
SKYDOG1  •  4 months ago  •  Imperial Cutter
I always engineer the lot esp. the power reactor and shield jenny.
SKYDOG1 avatar
SKYDOG1  •  4 months ago  •  Imperial Cutter
Need to save a few creds and get promoted up with the Imps first ;o)
SKYDOG1 avatar
SKYDOG1  •  4 months ago  •  Type 10 Defender
I bought one today at Strzelecki Gateway LP 7-226 ... Power and Dist were still 6E. Flogged it back as it's pretty useless with less than 8's and lost 11 million on the sale. Grrrrr!
Roguey avatar
Roguey  •  5 months ago  •  Ship build section back
not sure what you mean.
Liyanin avatar
Liyanin  •  5 months ago  •  Ship build section back
I will never have those links.
scottearle avatar
scottearle  •  5 months ago  •  Xeno Scanner
That just means nobody sells it within 50ly
surferx avatar
surferx  •  6 months ago  •  X4 (Home)
Rogey, will you evaluate the game again after the Split Vendetta is released with the 3.0 update? I think the game has come a long way to address some of your dislikes. It will get more missions, and ships and sectors -hoping you will add these to your database. JW because it's been kind of quiet here lately.
bladesteel2000 avatar
bladesteel2000  •  6 months ago  •  Asp Explorer
Working on now FSD booster
CMD_DesertNinja avatar
CMD_DesertNinja  •  6 months ago  •  Ship build section back
When are you going to have xbox and ps4 links?
Castor avatar
Castor  •  6 months ago  •  Split Elephant
There are only a couple of reasons you would want a TL ship, so this is the worst of them. You need storage space, not redundant guns. As bad as it is, even the Yaki have a better TL.
Castor avatar
Castor  •  6 months ago  •  Terran Katana
While it's not the best M6, it's certainly not the worst, contrary to opinion below.

- Price: low; this ship is one of the more affordable you can have, and that doesn't necessarily mean lower-quality building.
- Hull strength: low; there's a reason it's lower, and it's not just because of its price.
- Shield strength: high; it sports the second-highest shield rating of all M6s. Bad pilots stress that too much and end up eating into the hull. That's on you, not the ship. Pitting it against M7+ is cocky at best - same applies to all M6 units.
- Speed: average; it does the job.
- Turn rate: average; it does the job.
- Cargo space: average/below average. You mount fewer M/AMLs, but there's no good reason to have them on moving turrets, anyway. Keep them on the cockpit.

Now on top of that, it also happens to have a few more armament placements than most other M6 units. Again, it's not the best in that regard either, but it doesn't qualify as one of the worst - even if it does have limited choice when it comes to weapons.

Yes, you could very well grab yourself a Springblossom, the Terran M6 counterpart (frankly, using anything but the Hyperion Vanguard is a sin), and while Springblossom has two more weapon placements, it also has innately weaker weapon variants. The prototype M/AML and EMPC are both weaker than the revised ones used on most Terran ships. They're less specialised compared to commonwealth weapons, and they're better at all-rounder jobs. So, no, if you're after the armoured transport, the Springblossom is what you're after. Again, though - Hyperion Vanguard excels in almost every respect, so get that instead of either of these.

It's also not the worst-looking ship of its type, that much is true. Looks better than the flying sex toys that the Argon deploy everywhere.
Castor avatar
Castor  •  6 months ago  •  Terran Kyoto
Xenon I would like to have a word.

« Previous | Pages 123456789101112131415 | Next »