I didnt think those laws were meant to be understood like that. As it would basically end all fan-sites, gaming sites and more. Most sites have content which could be deemed as copyrighted material, whether its just a screen-shot, video etc. However just because they have a image or so, doesn't mean the site supports illegal activities. Heck, how would a fan work without no images/videos from the game? If anything fan-sites supporting a game will aid in sales, helping people understand the game and promoting their content. Would EA/Activision etc. like to see no fan-sites?
My understanding of those acts, as that those big companies could shut-down a site without warning if the site hosts or supports piracy of software/video/films. Before those acts, if a user posted a link/content, then it wasnt the site owner fault and you were given a few days to remove the link/content. However these new acts could mean the site-owner is responsible for all content, and needs to keep their site free from pirated content. If found with some, the US government could shut-down your site without warning.